Legal Opinion

Walker v. Duba

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 29, 2004No. 2003-CA-001820-MRPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SCHRODER, Judge.

This appeal discusses the rights and obligations of an upper elevation owner in ridding itself of diffused surface waters onto lands below. Kentucky has adopted the “reasonable use” rule which is a modification of the “common enemy” doctrine. The reasonableness of a land owner’s actions is an issue of fact and the trial court’s findings will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion. We see no abuse of discretion and affirm.

Eugene and Dorothy Duba own a lot and house on a hillside in a subdivision in Jefferson County. Below their property is a lot and house…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sheehan v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894
  2. Enderson v. KelehanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Vinson v. SorrellKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Klutey v. Commonwealth, Department of HighwaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1968
  5. Sherfey v. SherfeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Herndon v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API