Mountain States Legal Foundation v. Clark
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SETH, Chief Judge.
The complaint of plaintiffs, who are owners of grazing lands, brought this action against the Secretary of Interior and the United States for the unconstitutional taking, without condemnation proceedings, of forage on their private lands. This taking, *793it is alleged, resulted from the failure by the defendants to manage herds of wild horses contrary and in violation of the Wild Free-Roaming Horses and Burros Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1331 et seq. Mandamus is sought to require defendants to remove the horses from plaintiffs’ lands. Also substantial damages were sought against the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Contributors to the Pennsylvania Hospital v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1970
- American Horse Protection Ass'n v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 1978
- Roaring Springs Associates v. AndrusDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1978
- United States v. 12.18 Acres Of Land In Jefferson County, KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
3Cited by4 opinions
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. HodelCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Mountain States Legal Foundation v. William ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984