Legal Opinion
Miami Tele-Communications, Inc. v. City of Miami
District Court, S.D. Florida
Decided July 19, 1990No. 90-0517-CIVPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINAL JUDGMENT
RYSKAMP, District Judge.
This cause is before the court upon conclusion of a nonjury trial. After careful consideration of the parties’ memoranda and the evidence and arguments presented at trial, the court concludes that the City of Miami’s imposition of a penalty against the plaintiff is improper, and the plaintiff is entitled to a declaratory judgment and in-junctive relief.
I. BACKGROUND
In 1980, the Miami City Commission [“the city commission” or “the commission”] adopted Cable Television License Ordinance No. 9223 [“the enabling ordinance”] which set forth the general terms,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Safeco Insurance Company of America and Eatherly Construction Company, Plaintiffs-Appellants/cross-Appellees v. City of White House, Tennessee, Defendant-Appellee/cross-Appellant, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Holmes v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1994
- Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. City of White HouseCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999