Legal Opinion
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell v. Granger
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided April 7, 2004No. 03-1412Published
1Opinion of the Court
JjPICKETT, Judge.
FACTS
Gold, Weems, Bruser, Sues & Rundell (the Gold firm) filed suit against Tommie Mack Granger to recover unpaid attorney fees and expenses arising out of their representation of Mr. Granger in custody litigation against his ex-wife. In his answer, Mr. Granger prayed for a trial by jury. After posting the appropriate bond, the trial court issued an order granting a trial by jury.
On August 18, 2003, the Gold firm filed a Motion to Withdraw Order Granting Trial by Jury, claiming that this suit is for the recovery of attorney fees and the reasonableness of attorney fees is…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Saucier v. Hayes Dairy Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1979
- Champagne v. American Southern Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
- Cambridge Corner Corp. v. MenardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1988
- Chittenden v. State Farm Mut. Auto Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2001
- Parker v. Rowan Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.