Legal Opinion
ORDAZ
Board of Immigration Appeals
Decided July 1, 2015No. ID 3845PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Cite as
26 I&N Dec. 637
(BIA 2015) Interim Decision #3845 Matter of Marcos Victor ORDAZ-Gonzalez, Respondent Decided July 24, 2015 U.S. Department of Justice Executive Office for Immigration Review Board of Immigration Appeals A notice to appear that was served on an alien but never resulted in the commencement of removal proceedings does not have “stop-time” effect for purposes of establishing eligibility for cancellation of removal pursuant to section 240A(d)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(d)(1) (2012). FOR RESPONDENT: Andrew Knapp, Esquire, Los Angeles,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Robinson v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- K Mart Corp. v. Cartier, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sprietsma v. Mercury MarineSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Negusie v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- RICHMONDBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2016
- ROSALES VARGAS and ROSALES ROSALESBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2020
- ANDRADE JASO and CARBAJAL AYALABoard of Immigration Appeals · 2019