Baum v. Bosworth
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Door County. The facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion. To the point that the transaction in question was fraudulent and the chattel mortgage void, counsel for the respondents cited Anderson v. Patterson, 04 Wis. 557; Smith v. Welch, 10 id. 91; Grant v. Lewis, 14 id. 487; Wait on Eraud. Conv. 198, 257.
1Opinion of the Court
'ORToh, J.
There was an execution for $408.78, in favor of the respondents and against one William Yoight, in the hands of the sheriff unsatisfied, and appellants were summoned as garnishees, and answered that they had no money or other property in their hands belonging to said execution defendant, and that they were not indebted to him in any sum whatever. The respondents formed an issue on said answer, and the case was tried by a jury, and a verdict was rendered for the respondents, against said appellants as such garnishees, for the sum of $429, and judgment entered thereon, from which this…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Anderson v. PattersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1885
3Cited by1 opinion
- Carter, Rittenberg & Hainlin Co. v. McDonaldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896