Olson v. City of Platteville
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.
The ordinances by their terms include all moving picture houses within the city limits and provide a safety requirement applicable to each such building. There is no attempt at classification by way of setting apart one group of moving picture theaters from another. “Order 5100,” embodied in the ordinance, is a lawful requirement as to certain types of building construction. It is a part of the building code of the state of Wisconsin. The appellant admits his building does not satisfy the specifications of the ordinances, but claims that he complied with general orders applying to existing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Janesville v. CarpenterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1890
- Mehlos v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1914
- Holzbauer v. RitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Hack v. City of Mineral PointWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- President of Waupun v. MooreWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Wisconsin's Environmental Decade, Inc. v. Department of Natural ResourcesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Fox v. City of RacineWisconsin Supreme Court · 1937
- Clinton v. . RossSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
- City of Madison v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1980
- Mears v. Colonial BeachSupreme Court of Virginia · 1936
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.