Legal Opinion

C & T Recreation, Inc. v. Cannon Minnesota Corp.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 14, 1985No. C7-84-1669PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOZNIAK, Presiding Judge.

Cannon Minnesota appeals from an order denying its motion for an amended answer and counterclaim. The trial court found that Cannon had not brought the motion in good faith, finding it to be a collateral attack on the judgment sale, and assessed attorney’s fees against Cannon in the amount of $1,168. C & T seeks review of its motion to strike, which was denied as moot. We affirm.

FACTS AND BACKGROUND LITIGATION

This is the case of the haunted house. Cannon Minnesota (the principal being Chadwick R. Cannon) and C & T Recreation (C & T) were co-owners of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Northern States Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Millis v. LombardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dakota Bank & Trust Co. of Bismarck v. ReedNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Joe M. Baragas and Randall McLerran v. Coupland State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
  3. Joe M. Baragas and Randall McLerran v. Coupland State Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API