Legal Opinion

People v. Rosenberg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 11, 2003No. 3-02-0759PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Lytton

Defendant, Adam Rosenberg, was charged with controlled substance trafficking. His motion to suppress evidence was denied, and he was found guilty. We vacate the trial judge’s order on the motion to suppress, remand for a new hearing on the motion and retain jurisdiction to determine the remaining substantive issues should the State prevail at the new hearing.

Rosenberg paid David Belmonte $9,000 to drive from San Diego, California, to Boston, Massachusetts, with 28 cases of ketamine, a controlled substance, in the trunk of a car that Rosenberg rented.

While traveling through Illinois with the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  2. People v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  3. United States v. Natividad Duran, United States of America v. Martin Roman, United States of America v. Rodolfo Almaraz MoraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. Timothy James WhiteheadCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Benjamin v. Board of Election CommissionersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. RosenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. RosenbergIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. RosenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API