Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Laughman

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 5, 1982No. 107PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, Judge:

Appellant contends that the lower court erred in not declaring a mistrial when the victim testified over objection to unrelated prior criminal activity of appellant. We agree and, accordingly, reverse the judgment of sentence and grant a new trial.

On October 21, 1979, the victim received severe facial injuries in an altercation with appellant in the bathroom of a York County tavern. Appellant was subsequently found guilty of assault in a jury trial and following the denial of post-trial motions and the imposition of sentence, took this appeal.

Appellant contends that the lower…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Commonwealth v. FortuneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. SpruillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Commonwealth v. NicholsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. WoodburySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
  2. Commonwealth v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. SpellerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. BarbaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Commonwealth v. GaerttnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API