Legal Opinion

Provosty v. ARC Construction, LLC

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 2016No. 2015-CA-1219PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge Edwin A. Lombard

11 Appellants Henry and Gloria Provosty (“the Provostys”) seek review of two district court judgments on appeal: a March 13, 2012 judgment granting defendant Ice-house Capital Management, LLC (“Ice-house”), a new trial, and a September 2, 2015 judgment holding that the corporate veil of defendant ARC Construction, L.L.C. (“the ARC”), should not be pierced as to Icehouse through its managing member Marc Winthrop. After converting the Provostys’ appeal to an application for supervisory writs, which we grant, we affirm the district court judgments finding that the district…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  3. Ferry v. Holmes & Barnes, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
  4. Evans v. LungrinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. Hall v. Folger Coffee Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Orleans Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  2. S. Coil Tubing, Inc. v. Oracle Gas, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Huntsman International, L.L.C. and Rubicon, L.L.C. v. Praxair, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2024
  4. Lionel Jones and Willie Wilson v. Maryland Casualty Company, Zurich American Insurance Company, Powell's Cable Company and Karen A. JonesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. Southern Coil Tubing, Inc. v. Oracle Gas, LLCLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API