Legal Opinion
Neely v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided October 23, 2003No. 25274PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNETH W. SHRUM, Judge.
Jackson Neely (“Movant”) seeks post-conviction relief via a Rule 29.15 motion after he was convicted by a jury of murder in the first degree in violation of section 565.020, RSMo (1994). 1 Movant alleges: (1) his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to rehabilitate a witness by use of a prior consistent statement, and (2) his appellate counsel was ineffective for failing to assert a claim of plain error on appeal regarding Movant’s invocation of his right to remain silent. Following an evidentiary hearing, the motion court denied Movant’s requested post-conviction…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Doyle v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- State v. RamseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bryan v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Marschke v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hill v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Londagin v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Cook v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004