Legal Opinion
Euziere v. Highway Commissioner
Appellate Court of Illinois
Decided January 15, 1931No. Gen. No. 8,294PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Boggs
An action in assumpsit was instituted by appellee against appellant in the circuit court of Kankakee county to recover the amount alleged to be owing for certain materials furnished by appellee to appellant as highway commissioner.
The declaration consists of the common counts and one special count, which special count is as follows:
“For that, whereas, the defendant, on etc., in the county aforesaid, was a quasi corporation, and it was the defendant’s duty to keep the roads and bridges of the said Town of Rockville in repair and to improve the same so far as practicable, for which purpose the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Hitchcock v. GalvestonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- City of East St. Louis v. East St. Louis Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
- People ex rel. Stead v. Spring Lake Drainage & Levee DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1912
- McGovern v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1917
- Maher v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Austin-Western Road Machinery Co. v. WetzelAppellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- People ex rel. Euziere v. RiceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
- Blazer v. HIGHWAY COM'R OF MARENGO TP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1968