Legal Opinion

Dunn v. Green

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1920No. 21685PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Proceeding between C. K. Dunn and T. K. Green. Judgment for the latter, and the former applies for a writ of' certiorari.

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, O. J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

The appellant suggests that the record in this case is incomplete, in that it does not contain the transcript of the evidence on which the cáse was tried, and requests a writ of certiorari, directing the clerk of the court below to send up the transcript of the evidence. .

The court below adjourned before the expiration of the time allowed by law for the term. The notice to transcribe his notes of the evidence was served on the stenographer more than ten days after the adjournment of the court, but within ten days after the expiration of the time…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Richmond v. EnochsMississippi Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Shaw v. Bula Cannon Shops, Inc.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Armour & Co. v. StrahanMississippi Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Booker v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Southern Christian Leadership Conference, Inc. v. A. G. Corp.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Redmond v. HilliardMississippi Supreme Court · 1940

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API