Alex Lamota Marti v. Todd Manning, et al.
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEX LAMOTA MARTI, No. 2:21-cv-01829 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TODD MANNING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under
42 U.S.C. § 18
1983. There are several discovery motions pending before the court. For the reasons set forth 19 below, the undersigned resolves the motions as follows: 20 1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 103) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court reconsiders its prior order (ECF No.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.