Legal Opinion

Alex Lamota Marti v. Todd Manning, et al.

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 19, 2025No. 2:21-cv-01829Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEX LAMOTA MARTI, No. 2:21-cv-01829 SCR P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 TODD MANNING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under

42 U.S.C. § 18

1983. There are several discovery motions pending before the court. For the reasons set forth 19 below, the undersigned resolves the motions as follows: 20 1. Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration (ECF No. 103) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The court reconsiders its prior order (ECF No.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dairl Johnson Claudine Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Mladen Zivkovic v. Southern California Edison CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Marlyn Nutraceuticals, Inc. v. Mucos Pharma GmbH & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  5. Residential Funding Corporation v. Degeorge Financial Corp., Degeorge Home Alliance, Inc. And Degeorge Capital CorpCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API