Legal Opinion

Bittick v. Ward

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 4, 1969No. 7086PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEPHENSON, Justice.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries received in an automobile collision. Trial was by jury and judgment was rendered for plaintiff upon the special issues. The parties will he referred to here as they were in the trial court.

The jury found defendant negligent in not keeping a proper lookout, and that this was a proximate cause of the occurrence in question. These findings are not under attack. In response to the first damage issue covering doctor’s services and drug expense, the jury gave this answer: “$500.00 five Hundred & no cents. This is all in this…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. C. & R. TRANSPORT, INC. v. CampbellTexas Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Company v. Van ZandtTexas Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Texas Indemnity Insurance v. StaggsTexas Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Lowery v. BerryTexas Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Moore v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1887

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Sansom v. Pizza Hut of East Texas, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  2. Bazzano v. WareCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Franco v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1971
  4. Billy J. McKinzie and Wife, Judy McKinzie Individually and as Next Friend of Stuart McKinzie a Minor v. Michael Wayne Fleming and Star Tool CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. Carter v. LeeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API