Legal Opinion

Village of Skaneateles v. Town of Skaneateles

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 15, 1985PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Report of Referees annulled, without costs, and judgment granted in favor of respondent adjudging that the annexation is not in the over-all public interest. Memorandum: For the reasons stated in the report of the dissenting Referee, Honorable John F. Lawton, J.S.C., we find that the annexation would not be in the over-all public interest. As noted in the dissent, the sole reason that the village and the intervening property owner seek annexation is to avoid the restrictive effect of the town zoning ordinance on the 2.852 acres of intervenor’s property situated in the town by removing the…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re PadillaNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  2. Board of Trustees of Pomona v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
  3. Board of Trustees of Spring Valley v. Town of RamapoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API