Legal Opinion

Maupin v. Fry

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided June 9, 1961No. Civ. No. 3064Published

1Opinion of the Court

William E. Miller, Chief Judge.

This is an action instituted by the plaintiff, Joseph H. Maupin, against the defendants, Carl Fry, Edward Jones and Crosby Wright, individually and as constituting the Tennessee Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Committee, for a declaratory judgment that the plaintiff has not been legally removed from his office as State Administrative Officer, Agricultural Stabilization Office, that he is still entitled to the rights and privileges thereof, and for a temporary injunction restraining the defendants from further usurping the plaintiff’s office, or from…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Williams v. FanningSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Payne v. McKeeDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1957
  3. Henry v. NewmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Schwartz v. MathiasCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
  5. Hillery v. MooreDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API