Fenwick v. Illinois Cent. R.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Iii Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of Mississippi.
1Opinion of the Court
SHELBY, Circuit Judge.
Joseph Fenwick, the plaintiff, was injured while in the employment of the defendant. He alleged that *248the injury was caused by the negligence of Frank Puckett, who was also a servant of the defendant. Puckett, Hughes, Fredericks, and the plaintiff constituted the switch crew in defendant’s yard at McComb City, Miss. Sullivan was the yard master, and, on the night that the injury occurred, Frank Puckett was acting as foreman of the switch crew. In the absence of statutes or constitutional provisions controlling the case, it is conceded that the plaintiff could not recover,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- California v. San Pablo & Tulare RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Central Railroad Company v. KeeganSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Evans v. Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1893
3Cited by3 opinions
- Grand Rapids & Indiana Railway Co. v. PettitIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
- Indiana Manufacturing Co. v. BuskirkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
- Miller v. Townley Manufacturing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1914