Lambert v. Jefferson
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
FOSTER, Justice.
The Court of Appeals held that the sixth plea was subject to demurrer, because it was not sufficient in respect to the damage claimed, and because “no facts tending to show a breach were set forth.”
The complaint was in a common count for work and labor done. The sixth plea was one of recoupment, for that in respect to the contract for labor sued on plaintiff verbally agreed, as a feature of his work for defendant as sales manager, to perform the duties usual and proper in such employment and to conduct said business as sales manager in a careful skillful and diligent manner;…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Donnell v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1848
- Worthington & Co. v. GwinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898
- Watt's Ex'rs. v. SheppardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
- Adler v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- Alabama Fuel & Iron Co. v. BushSupreme Court of Alabama · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Smith v. DossSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
- Harris v. Board of Water and Sewer Com'rs of City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad Co. v. SizemoreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
- Southern Railway Co. v. JarvisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
- Roth v. SpeckDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1956
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.