Legal Opinion
Hinckley v. Casey
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 6, 1909No. 7877Published
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Gilliam, J., entered March 7, 1908, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action to recover upon an appeal bond.
1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.
The principal question in this case arises upon the demurrer to plaintiffs’ complaint, which was by the court overruled. The allegations of the complaint, omitting formal parts, are as follows:
“That on or about June 1, 1906, said T. D. Hinckley, deceased, and wife, commenced an action in the above entitled court against said J. T. Casey and T. J. Casey to recover possession of certain office rooms, to wit: rooms 412 and 413 in the Hinckley block, in the City of Seattle, and that a trial was had in said action, and a verdict rendered by a jury on October 31, 1906. That thereafter judgment was…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Northwestern & Pacific Hypotheek Bank v. GriffittsWashington Supreme Court · 1897
- Carmack v. DrumWashington Supreme Court · 1902