In re Young Children
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 632.] IN RE YOUNG CHILDREN. IN RE BUNTING CHILDREN. IN RE BROCK CHILDREN. IN RE FARRAR ET AL. [Cite as In re Young Children,
1996-Ohio-45.] Juvenile court—Passing of statutory time period pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(F) does not divest juvenile courts of jurisdiction to enter dispositional orders. (Nos. 95-941, 95-942, 95-1213, 95-1510, 95-1526 and 95-1688—Submitted April 30, 1996—Decided October 9, 1996.) The passing of the statutory time period (“sunset date”) pursuant to R.C. 2151.353 (F) does not divest juvenile courts…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- In re Young ChildrenOhio Supreme Court · 1996
- Endsley v. EndsleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
3Cited by2 opinions
- Coleman v. Campbell, Unpublished Decision (7-26-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
- In re E.R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024