Legal Opinion

In re Young Children

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1996No. 1995-0941PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 76 Ohio St.3d 632.] IN RE YOUNG CHILDREN. IN RE BUNTING CHILDREN. IN RE BROCK CHILDREN. IN RE FARRAR ET AL. [Cite as In re Young Children,

1996-Ohio-45.] Juvenile court—Passing of statutory time period pursuant to R.C. 2151.353(F) does not divest juvenile courts of jurisdiction to enter dispositional orders. (Nos. 95-941, 95-942, 95-1213, 95-1510, 95-1526 and 95-1688—Submitted April 30, 1996—Decided October 9, 1996.) The passing of the statutory time period (“sunset date”) pursuant to R.C. 2151.353 (F) does not divest juvenile courts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Young ChildrenOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Endsley v. EndsleyOhio Court of Appeals · 1993

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Coleman v. Campbell, Unpublished Decision (7-26-2002)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. In re E.R.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API