Odegaard v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1ConcurrenceLaROSE, Judge
I concur fully in the court’s decision to reverse the postconviction court’s order. I write to express my view that, on remand, the postconviction court must consider carefully the impact of the United States Supreme Court’s decisions in Lafler v. Cooper, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1376, 182 L.Ed.2d 398 (2012), and Missouri v. Frye,— U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 1399, 182 L.Ed.2d 379 (2012), and the Supreme Court of Florida’s decision in Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), on the Strickland prejudice prong. A bit of history will be helpful.
In Cottle v. State, 733 So.2d 963, 966-67 (Fla.1999), our…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Padilla v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.