State v. Clarke
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of Mankato.
1Opinion of the CourtMitchell, J.
Chapter 134, Laws 1881, provides that “any person who shall use, in reference to and in the presence of another, * * * abusive or obscene language, intended or naturally tending to provoke an assault, or any breach of the peace, shall be punished,” etc. The complaint under this statute should state the name of the person in reference to and in whose presence the language was .used, if the name be known; and if it be unknown, it is at least necessary to so allege. This is necessary to the identification of the of-fence, not only so as to inform the defendant of the particular thing with which…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. SchmailSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1879
3Cited by2 opinions
- State ex rel. McDonald v. RileySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
- State v. TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901