Legal Opinion

Davis v. Nelson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 9, 1994No. 64079PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRIMM, Presiding Judge.

In this bench trial, plaintiff1 sought (1) to compel defendant2 to specifically perform an agreement they made to terminate a condominium agreement and (2) to establish a fee simple ownership of the two condo units. Also, he sought to terminate any interest defendant has in an adjoining lot.

On the other hand, defendant contended the termination would create an illegal subdivision. Further, he sought unlimited access to an expanded driveway and garden on the adjoining lot.

*660The trial court found for plaintiff. It ordered defendant “to execute the documents necessary to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keeshan v. Embassy Investment CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  2. Lewis v. ThompsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1936
  3. Hermann v. Lynnbrook Land Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1991
  4. Archway Kitchen & Bath, Inc. v. Lands Development Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Williams v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  2. Chesus v. WattsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. American National Insurance Co. v. Noble Communications Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. Behr v. Bird Way, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. American Realty Trust, Inc. v. First Bank of MissouriMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API