Legal Opinion

State v. Brea

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided December 29, 1987No. 86-3210PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.

The state, purportedly invoking Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(B), seeks appellate review of a pretrial order granting the defendant-appellee’s motion to decline to admit an alleged co-conspirator’s statements into evidence. The basis of the ruling below was that the co-conspirator, who was then a co-defendant, had been granted a directed verdict in his favor on the grounds of entrapment in an earlier trial, thus, it was reasoned, rendering it impossible for him to act as a member of the conspiracy. We do not reach the merits of this controversy because…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  2. State v. SteinbrecherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. People v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
  4. State v. PalmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. McPhadder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. BreaSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
  2. State v. BreaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API