State v. Brea
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge.
The state, purportedly invoking Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.140(c)(1)(B), seeks appellate review of a pretrial order granting the defendant-appellee’s motion to decline to admit an alleged co-conspirator’s statements into evidence. The basis of the ruling below was that the co-conspirator, who was then a co-defendant, had been granted a directed verdict in his favor on the grounds of entrapment in an earlier trial, thus, it was reasoned, rendering it impossible for him to act as a member of the conspiracy. We do not reach the merits of this controversy because…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. LenarchickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. SteinbrecherDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
- People v. HobbsIllinois Supreme Court · 1948
- State v. PalmoreSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
- McPhadder v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. BreaSupreme Court of Florida · 1988
- State v. BreaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989