Barth v. Schmitz
New York Supreme Court
Action to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
1Opinion of the CourtCallaghan, J.
This action was brought to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Plaintiffs seek to fasten liability *269upon the defendants Schmitz, the owners of the property, by reason of their consent and acquiescence in the making of the repairs, and upon the provisions of the lease which were that the benefits to be derived from the alterations and repairs should, upon the expiration of the tenancy, become the property of the owners, and upon the further ground that by the terms of the lease the lessee was compelled, in effect, to make the repairs.
Prior to the making of the lease the lessee .and the owners…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Jones v. . MenkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- New York Elevator Supply & Repair Co. v. BremerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
- New York Elevator Supply and Repair Company v. . BremerNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Robb v. OsgoodbyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1897
3Cited by3 opinions
- Price Bros. Co. v. Olin Const. Co., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1981
- Mulcahy Lumber Co. v. OhlandArizona Supreme Court · 1934
- C. Wilson's Plumbing Shop On Wheels, Inc. v. Trustees of Dartmouth CollegeNew York Supreme Court · 1938