Legal Opinion

Snedecor v. Chapel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 15, 1920PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiff was not premature in moving for judgment upon the first answer, since she moved after issue joined. (Code Civ. Proc. § 547.) A power to amend cannot be invoked to defeat such motion unless exercised by serving a new answer before the motion is heard. (Dorf v. Corsa, 163 N. Y. Supp. 602.) But service of a new answer wholly supersedes the original answer. The order thereon then becomes unimportant, save as to motion costs, and upon the hearing here these have been waived. Nothing substantial being now left, the appeal is dismissed, without costs. Jenks, P. J., Mills, Rich, Putnam and…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kafka v. O'MalleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
  2. Angelini v. Merchants Despatch Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. Wrobleski v. Wakefield Homes, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API