Hoffer v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1DissentDore, J.
(dissenting) — I dissent.
The appellants sue on nine causes of action. The majority recognizes eight of the nine as justiciable. Seven of those claims turn on the construction of a letter written by the State's Auditor. That letter does not support the appellants' allegations because the writing and dissemination of that letter were acts beyond the authority of the Auditor. Being ultra vires, the letter created no obligations and no liability on the part of the State. The eighth cause of action is barred by the well recognized rule that the State and its agents are not liable for alleged…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- American Nurses' Association v. State of IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Bender v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
- Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
- Bailey v. Town of ForksWashington Supreme Court · 1988
- Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.