Legal Opinion

Mullen v. Mullen

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided November 2, 1982No. 13188PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

GULOTTA, Judge.

Plaintiff-wife, appealing, claims the trial judge erred in awarding accumulated past-due alimony pendente lite from the date of the judgment fixing the alimony instead of from the filing of the petition.1 Plaintiff further seeks an increase in the attorney’s fee in accordance with LSA-R.S. 9:305.2

The initial judgment awarding alimony was silent concerning the date of commencement of alimony payments.3 The Second Circuit in such an instance concluded the trial judge had intended the rendition date as the commencement date. Cumpton v. Cumpton, 283 So.2d 846 (La. App. 2nd…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cotton v. WrightSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939
  2. Stansbury v. StansburyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1972
  3. Cumpton v. CumptonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1973
  4. Quinn v. QuinnLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Richard v. RichardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Key v. WillardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API