Holland v. Votaw
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
We agree with the Court of Civil Appeals in the construction of the Act of 1907 (Laws 30th Leg., 308), that it does not undertake to make valid conveyances that before were invalid, even where the invalidity exists only for want of proper certificates of acknowledgment to deeds of married women. That statute, as did the one of which it is an amendment, relates only to the admissibility of deeds as evidence because of their having been recorded, and not to questions affecting their sufficiency as conveyances. Therefore, no question arises as to the power of the Legislature to validate the…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Clements v. Texas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Pilkington v. PotwinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Hinojosa v. EdgertonTexas Supreme Court · 1969
- Delay v. TruittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- Acklin v. First National BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.