Legal Opinion
Baptist v. Adult & Family Services Division
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided August 10, 1983No. 2-2201-JOL840-1; 2-2201-JOL841; CA A21469 (Control); CA A21470PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, P. J.
Petitioner, the prevailing party in Baptist v. Adult & Family Services Div., 51 Or App 748, 646 P2d 645 (1982), seeks an award of an attorney fee pursuant to the Oregon Administrative Procedures Act (APA). We deny the petition.
Our original decision was on judicial review, pursuant to ORS 183.482(8), of two orders of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD). AFSD, in separate orders, had terminated petitioner’s aid to dependent children (ADC) grant and assessed petitioner $10,676 for past benefits received.
Petitioner’s ADC grant had been based on the absence from her home of her…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Van Gordon v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- Johnson v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
- State v. HackerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Cook v. Employment DivisionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Baptist v. Adult & Family Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by5 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Pend-Air Citizen's Committee v. City of PendletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- White v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Hoard v. Employment DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Cascade Kelly Holdings, LLC v. Oregon Department of EnergyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- Civil Service Board of Portland v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984