Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Simants

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 19, 1968No. 36663Published

1DissentMcCown, J.

I respectfully dissent. The problem posed is accented dramatically by the transcript in this case. A thorough and complete examination of that transcript does not reveal what act or acts were done by the defendants. The complaint itself alleges only that on a given date, and within the county, the defendants “did then and there contribute to the delinquency” of a named female child under 18,. “so that the child will tend to become a delinquent child.”

The district court specifically found that the statute was vague and uncertain, and also constitutes an unlawful delegation of legislative…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
  3. State v. VallerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
  4. State ex rel. English v. RubackNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  5. State v. CoomesNebraska Supreme Court · 1960

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API