State v. Simants
Nebraska Supreme Court
1DissentMcCown, J.
I respectfully dissent. The problem posed is accented dramatically by the transcript in this case. A thorough and complete examination of that transcript does not reveal what act or acts were done by the defendants. The complaint itself alleges only that on a given date, and within the county, the defendants “did then and there contribute to the delinquency” of a named female child under 18,. “so that the child will tend to become a delinquent child.”
The district court specifically found that the statute was vague and uncertain, and also constitutes an unlawful delegation of legislative…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Lanzetta v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- State v. VallerySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1948
- State ex rel. English v. RubackNebraska Supreme Court · 1938
- State v. CoomesNebraska Supreme Court · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.