Legal Opinion
Nolan v. Liuzza
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided October 9, 1974No. 6373PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
301 So.2d 892 (1974)
Hugh NOLAN
v.
Leon F. LIUZZA et al.
No. 6373.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fourth Circuit.
October 9, 1974.
William S. Vincent, Jr., Garrett, Carl & Roussel, New Orleans, for plaintiff-appellant.
Richard M. Michalczyk, Cronvich & Wambsgans, Metairie, for defendants-appellees.
Before REDMANN, GULOTTA and MORIAL, JJ.
REDMANN, Judge.
The basic question in this appeal is whether or not the owner of an automobile, temporarily deprived of its use while tort-caused damages are being repaired, may recover for that loss of use from the tortfeasor.
The answer is yes. In Reisz v. Kansas City…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hoffman v. All Star Insurance Corp.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
- Reisz v. Kansas City Southern R.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
- Sherwood v. American Ry. Express Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Desselle v. WilsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1967
- Carkuff v. Geophysical Service, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Alexander v. Qwik Change Car Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1977
- Chappetta v. Bowman Transp., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
- Barber v. BestLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981
- Chriss v. Manchester Insurance & Indemnity CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Pike v. Stephens Imports, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.