Kreidie v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.
At issue in this appeal is whether a procedural dismissal that is silent as to its prejudicial effect bars relitigation in a subsequent action. The appellant argues that the District Court erred in finding that his first action was adjudicated on the merits, thus having claim preclusive effect on his second action.
I
Appellant Marwan Kreidie began his employment in a non-policy position at the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of State Lotteries (“State Lottery”) on January 1, 2011. According to his complaint, he was also a member of the Democratic Party and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
- Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Brodsky v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- ELMO v. WOODBRIDGE BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021