Legal Opinion

Kreidie v. Secretary, Pennsylvania Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 21, 2014No. 13-4698UnpublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

At issue in this appeal is whether a procedural dismissal that is silent as to its prejudicial effect bars relitigation in a subsequent action. The appellant argues that the District Court erred in finding that his first action was adjudicated on the merits, thus having claim preclusive effect on his second action.

I

Appellant Marwan Kreidie began his employment in a non-policy position at the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Bureau of State Lotteries (“State Lottery”) on January 1, 2011. According to his complaint, he was also a member of the Democratic Party and…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Alston v. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
  2. Nami v. FauverCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1996
  3. Lillian Kachmar v. Sungard Data Systems, Inc. Lawrence A. Gross Donna J. PedrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  4. Gregory v. ChehiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
  5. Mullarkey v. TamboerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brodsky v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
  2. ELMO v. WOODBRIDGE BOARD OF EDUCATIONDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API