Moss v. Graves

This case is properly in this Court on original jurisdiction by Habeas Corpus.

The only question is the legal sufficiency of a warrant charging: “on the 20th day of January, A. D. 1941, in the county aforesaid one Gail S. Moss did have in his pos session a certain apparatus for the sale and disposal of mints ; any person depositing a nickel in said machine would in return receive a nickel package of mints; said machine has the appearance of and looks like a slot machine and operates with a lever on the side and therefore, is in violation of Chapter 18,143 of the Acts of 1937.”

The pertinent…