Legal Opinion

Hollander v. Nichols

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 20, 2009No. 1061094Published

1Opinion of the Court

19 So.3d 184 (2009)

Louis Frank HOLLANDER, Jr.

v.

Raymond Lee NICHOLS, Jr., et al.

1061094.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

March 20, 2009.

Michael L. Weathers, Florence, for appellant.

Nicolas B. Roth and Heather N. Hudson of Eyster, Key, Tubb, Roth, Middleton & Adams, LLP, Decatur, for appellees.

SMITH, Justice.

Louis Frank Hollander, Jr., appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of Raymond Lee Nichols, Jr., the North Alabama Bone and Joint Clinic, P.C. ("the Clinic"), and Shoals Orthopedics, P.C. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand.

Facts and Procedural History

Many of the facts relevant…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. William Edwards v. Aetna Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  3. Greene v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  4. Horne v. PattonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1973
  5. Age-Herald Pub. Co. v. HuddlestonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1921

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API