Legal Opinion

Feistman v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 15, 1971No. Docket No. 2129-70 SCUnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Eugene G. Feistman and Lorraine B. Feistman v. Commissioner.

Feistman v. Commissioner

Docket No. 2129-70 SC.

United States Tax Court

T.C. Memo 1971-137; 1971 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 192; 30 T.C.M. (CCH) 590; T.C.M. (RIA) 71137;

June 15, 1971, Filed.

Eugene Feistman, pro se, 15959 Gledhill St., Sepulveda, Calif.Harold Vestermark, Esq., for the respondent. 591

SACKS

Memorandum Findings of Fact and Opinion

SACKS, Commissioner: Respondent determined a deficiency of $543.07 in petitioners' 1967 Federal income tax return. In their original petition the petitioners contested this entire amount, and by their…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harold Dejong and Marjorie J. Dejong v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. McCabe v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1970

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Feistman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  2. Robert L. Hernandez v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
  3. Bartlett v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1975
  4. Feistman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1974
  5. Feistman v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API