Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Smith

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 10, 2016No. SC19322 ConcurrencePublished

1ConcurrenceMcDONALD, J.

I agree with the majority that the public safety exception to the dictates of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct. 1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), applied to the present case because the police officers had a legitimate concern about whether the defendant, Dante Smith, was armed, and whether the weapons identified by the victim, Justin Molinaro, could have been disposed of in a place where a child or other civilian might find them. 1 Here, however, well after the victim provided the police with an account of the attack and was transported for medical treatment, the defendant returned to…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Davis v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  5. New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API