Legal Opinion
Fowler v. Unified School District No. 259
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided November 4, 1997No. Nos. 95-3373, 95-3400PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHEN H. ANDERSON, Circuit Judge.
In February, 1997, we held that the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1420 (“IDEA”), and the regulations thereunder, as well as Kansas law, required the defendant, Unified School District No. 259, to at least partially pay for an on-site sign language interpreter for the plaintiff, Michael Fowler, a deaf child voluntarily attending a private school. Fowler v. Unified Sch. Dist. No. 259, 107 F.3d 797 (10th Cir.1997), cert. granted and vacated, — U.S. -, 117 S.Ct. 2503, 138 L.Ed.2d 1008 (1997). Both sides filed petitions for…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Cipollone v. Liggett Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United States Ex Rel. SchumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Peter v. WedlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Lawrence Township Board of Education v. State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Fowler v. Unified School District No. 259Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Krista Westendorp v. Robert WedlCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- BROWN v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITYDistrict Court, N.D. Florida · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.