Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo Hospital
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*2OPINION OF THE COURT BY
LEWIS, J.
I
At the outset We are confronted with a jurisdictional question. Defendant-appellee asserts that the appeal was taken prematurely. Notice of appeal was filed May 28, 1965, at which time the court had merely rendered its decision that, summary judgment would be entered in accordance with defendant’s motion. This decision, filed April 30, 1965, was entitled “Order on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment,” and concluded with the statement: “Motion for summary judgment is hereby granted.” Plaintiff mistakenly interpreted this to be a judgment. She appealed from…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Toilet Goods Ass'n v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961
- Huysman v. KirschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Hatsumi Yoshizaki v. Hilo HospitalHawaii Supreme Court · 1967
- Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1992
- Higa v. MirikitaniHawaii Supreme Court · 1973
- Office of Hawaiian Affairs v. StateHawaii Supreme Court · 2006
- Hays v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.