Legal Opinion

Kyle v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided January 14, 1920No. 5489PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

—The indictment charges appellant with having received from Otto Best a lot of jewelry, knowing same to have been stolen and that it had theretofore been acquired by Roberta Armstrong in such manner as that the acquisition came within the meaning of the term theft, and that appellant, knowing said property to have been so acquired, received and concealed it.

If the property was stolen, and appellant either received or concealed it, knowing at the time of such reception or at the time of such concealment that it was stolen, he would come within the purview of the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. G. W. and E. Wright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1897
  2. Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
  3. Bradshaw v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Windham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bloxom v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Rains v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1923
  3. Boone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  4. Colley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1940
  5. Garrett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API