Legal Opinion

In Re Hollis

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 26, 2009No. 07-BG-504Published

1Per curiam

Petitioner was disbarred in Maryland in 1997 for various acts of misconduct, including the intentional misappropriation of a client’s funds. Atty. Grievance Comm’n v. Hollis, 347 Md. 547, 702 A.2d 223 (1997). In 1998, we reciprocally disbarred him in the District of Columbia in a proceeding in which he did not participate. In re Hollis, 719 A.2d 965 (D.C.1998). He now seeks readmission to our bar.

After an evidentiary hearing extending over three separate days, an Ad Hoc Hearing Committee recommended that readmission be denied. The Board on Professional Responsibility, after reviewing the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re RoundtreeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HollisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. In Re BettisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. In Re MorrellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. In Re HollisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API