Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Hicks

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided September 30, 1999No. 97-0432; Crim.App. No. 9502205Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

When I review the facts of this case, I think of this core idea expressed by Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.:

*73When we study law we are not studying a mystery but a well-known profession. We are studying what we shall want in order to appear before judges, or to advise people in such a way as to keep them out of court____ People want to know under what circumstances and how far they will run the risk of coming against what is so much stronger than themselves [the public force of the courts].

“The Path of Law,” Collected Legal Papers 167 (New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1921). More…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  2. James J. Kevlik v. David B. Goldstein, Town of DerryCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
  3. In re Grand Jury ProceedingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Peter CancillaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  5. Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API