People v. Knox
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
We are of the opinion that the identity of the defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the verdict on that point is against the weight of the evidence. Dr. Goldberg’s identification, weakened by the gross misdescription which he gave to the police immediately after the hold-up, coupled *124with, the uncertain identification by the witness Green, is not sufficient to warrant the verdict of the jury in view of the testimony given by the defendant and the five witnesses who testified on his behalf.
The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted.
It may…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. GowaskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. DaceyNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1938
- State v. HillerudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
- People v. BigleyNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- People ex rel. Cullen v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
- People v. CastellanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.