Legal Opinion

People v. Knox

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 14, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

We are of the opinion that the identity of the defendant was not established beyond a reasonable doubt, and that the verdict on that point is against the weight of the evidence. Dr. Goldberg’s identification, weakened by the gross misdescription which he gave to the police immediately after the hold-up, coupled *124with, the uncertain identification by the witness Green, is not sufficient to warrant the verdict of the jury in view of the testimony given by the defendant and the five witnesses who testified on his behalf.

The judgment of conviction should be reversed and a new trial granted.

It may…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. GowaskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1927

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. DaceyNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1938
  2. State v. HillerudSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1957
  3. People v. BigleyNew York Supreme Court · 1942
  4. People ex rel. Cullen v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1939
  5. People v. CastellanoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API