Legal Opinion

Moore v. City of Middletown

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 2012No. 2010-1363PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[Cite as Moore v. Middletown, 133 Ohio St.3d 55,

2012-Ohio-3897.] MOORE ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. CITY OF MIDDLETOWN, APPELLEE. [Cite as Moore v. Middletown, 133 Ohio St.3d 55,

2012-Ohio-3897.] Declaratory judgments—Zoning—Standing—Owner of property adjacent to property rezoned by foreign municipality has standing to bring declaratory-judgment action to challenge constitutionality of zoning if owner pleads injury caused by rezoning that is likely to be redressed. (No. 2010-1363—Submitted September 6, 2011—Decided August 30, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Butler County, No.…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. O'Neal v. State (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API