Rangeley v. Goodwin
Superior Court of New Hampshire
' Writ of Entry, for the recovery of a farm. The tenant pleaded the general issue. To support the issue on his part the demandant’s counsel introduced a certified copy of an original writ, in favor of the plaintiff, against David "Webster and Daniel Burnham, on a certain note of hand therein set forth, for $15,000; the writ bearing date August 27, 1837, returnable to the court of common pleas for Strafford, the third Tuesday of January, 1838, on which the officer returns an…
Read the full summary
' Writ of Entry, for the recovery of a farm. The tenant pleaded the general issue. To support the issue on his part the demandant’s counsel introduced a certified copy of an original writ, in favor of the plaintiff, against David "Webster and Daniel Burnham, on a certain note of hand therein set forth, for $15,000; the writ bearing date August 27, 1837, returnable to the court of common pleas for Strafford, the third Tuesday of January, 1838, on which the officer returns an attachment, among other parcels of real estate, of that described in the present declaration, by the name of the “ Page…
1Opinion of the CourtGilchrist, J.
By the act of December 29, 1832, entitled an act relating to the organization of the courts of justice, see. 15, it is provided that “ all writs of execution and writs of possession, issuing from the superior court of judicature, shall be made returnable at or before the expiration of six months from the date thereof, or at the next regular term of said court in said county, if within six months ; and the forms of such writs shall be varied accordingly; and such writs, if returnable in vacation, shall be returned and filed with the clerk of said court in said county.”
The demandant’s claim to…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Blaisdell v. SheafeSuperior Court of New Hampshire · 1830
3Cited by1 opinion
- McBurney v. ShawSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002