Legal Opinion

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Lewelling

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 29, 1966PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The accused is charged with professional misconduct. As a result of excessive use of intoxicating liquor the accused neglected his professional duties. *283He was guilty of inordinate delay in answering correspondence relating to cases in which, he was retained ; he failed to complete proceedings which he had initiated for clients; he failed to pay filing fees, and he failed to keep adequate accounts of his own and his clients’ funds as a consequence of which the funds were commingled and withdrawals were made for his personal use.

It is conceded by the Board of Governors that none of the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Discipline of WalkerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. In Re James H. LewellingOregon Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API