Legal Opinion

Prosser v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 4, 2015No. Nos. 13-4526-ag (L), 13-4527-ag (CON)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DRONEY, Circuit Judge:

Robert and Mary Prosser (“the Prossers”) and the McGehee Family Clinic (“the Clinic,” and collectively “Petitioners”) filed petitions for redetermination in the United States Tax Court challenging the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s (“Commissioner”) determination of tax deficiencies and assessment of penalties against them under § 6662A of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. (“I.R.C.”). The Commissioner had determined that Petitioners were deficient based on a contribution by the Clinic to a multiple-employer welfare benefit plan, the Benistar 419 Plan…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. United States v. International Minerals & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Willcutts v. BunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  4. Cottage Savings Assn. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Elizabeth N. Callaway v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vee's Marketing, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  2. Povolny Group, Incorporated v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API