Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Department of Revenue
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
*390¶1
Bridgewater, J.
— Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. (Texaco), appeals from a summary judgment order that the Department of Revenue (DOR) employed the proper method of valuation for calculating the manufacturing business and occupation (B&O) tax on petroleum products exchanged with other refineries under barter agreements. We hold that RCW 82.04.450 requires that a product be valued by the gross proceeds of sale, but where there are no proceeds (as here where there is a barter) the product should be valued by comparable sales. Because that statute is unambiguous, the burden is on the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
- American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Crystal Mountain, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Crystal Mountain Inc, V Wa State Dept Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
- Lakeside Indus., Inc. v. Dep't of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2023