Legal Opinion

Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided January 31, 2006No. 33315-5-IIPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*390¶1

Bridgewater, J.

— Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. (Texaco), appeals from a summary judgment order that the Department of Revenue (DOR) employed the proper method of valuation for calculating the manufacturing business and occupation (B&O) tax on petroleum products exchanged with other refineries under barter agreements. We hold that RCW 82.04.450 requires that a product be valued by the gross proceeds of sale, but where there are no proceeds (as here where there is a barter) the product should be valued by comparable sales. Because that statute is unambiguous, the burden is on the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Clements v. Travelers Indemnity Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. American Legion Post No. 32 v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  3. State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. MyersWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Simpson Inv. Co. v. State, Dept. of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2000

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crystal Mountain, Inc. v. Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Crystal Mountain Inc, V Wa State Dept Of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  3. Lakeside Indus., Inc. v. Dep't of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API